Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
4480 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
Tesla PG500 216 +1554%
14.13 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1260 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
640
Shading Units
5120
40
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
176.6 GPixel/s
26.68 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
441.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.26 TFLOPS
853.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.13 TFLOPS
26.68 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.066 TFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GV100
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy