Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 7000

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 7000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 6GB VRAM Quadro 7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 204W)
NVIDIA Quadro 7000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (163.4GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
Quadro 7000 +76%
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
May 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
851 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
163.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
576
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.23 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
-
-
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
204W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GF110
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy