Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 24GB VRAM Quadro M6000 24 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
Quadro M6000 24 GB +808%
6.844 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
988 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
576
Shading Units
3072
48
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
285.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GM200
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
GM200-880-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy