Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1350MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q +1001%
8.294 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
48
576
Shading Units
3072
48
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
259.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
16.59 TFLOPS
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.294 TFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
259.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
TU104
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy