Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 16GB VRAM Tesla P100 SXM2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
3008 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
Tesla P100 SXM2 +1309%
10.61 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1328 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
56
-
Compute Units
-
576
Shading Units
3584
48
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
142.1 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
331.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.22 TFLOPS
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.61 TFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.304 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GP100
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
GP100-890-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy