Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M +1517%
1.084 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
768
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G84
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy