Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M +1364%
1.084 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 320M
0.074 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.60 GFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G84
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
20W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy