Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 600W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
13312 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI300 +4316%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
14080
64
TMUs
880
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
880
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
600W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
153 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy