Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q +330%
4.666 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
1920
64
TMUs
120
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.76 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
145.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.331 TFLOPS
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.666 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
145.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
TU106
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
60W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy