Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M +25%
1.084 TFLOPS
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GM108
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
Unknown
294 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

75W
TDP
30W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy