Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs AMD Instinct MI300A

NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs AMD Instinct MI300A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Quadro K4000 and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 134.8GB/s)
13824 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4000
1.244 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300A +9755%
122.6 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1404 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
192bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
134.8GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
228
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
14592
64
TMUs
880
24
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
384 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
1244 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
760W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
MI300
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
146 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy