Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Quadro K4000 and 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 900W)
NVIDIA Tesla S2050 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 134.8GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4000 +21%
1.244 TFLOPS
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1404 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
134.8GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
768
Shading Units
448
64
TMUs
56
24
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
384 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1244 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
900W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy