Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Quadro K4000 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 134.8GB/s)
13312 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4000
1.244 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250X +3748%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1404 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
192bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
134.8GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
220
768
Shading Units
14080
64
TMUs
880
24
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
384 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

12.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
1244 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

80W
TDP
500W
250 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy