Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Quadro K4000 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 134.8GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4000
1.244 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216 +1159%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1312 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
1404 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
134.8GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
768
Shading Units
5120
64
TMUs
320
24
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
384 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
1244 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
GV100
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy