Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25

NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Quadro K4000 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (436.2GB/s vs 134.8GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4000
1.244 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI25 +887%
12.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jun 2017
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1404 MHz
Memory Clock
852 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
192bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
134.8GB/s
Bandwidth
436.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
24
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
384 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
1244 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy