Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Quadro K4000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (134.8GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4000 +2008%
1.244 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1404 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
134.8GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
384 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

12.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1244 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
42W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy