CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4000M and 12GB VRAM RTX A2000 12 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K4000M
1.154 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 12 GB
+592%
7.987 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K4000M
97
RTX A2000 12 GB
+1878%
1919
OctaneBench
Quadro K4000M
20
RTX A2000 12 GB
+1050%
230
Quadro K4000M
VS
RTX A2000 12 GB
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
562 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
26
-
Compute Units
-
960
Shading Units
3328
80
TMUs
104
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
Theoretical Performance
12.02 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
48.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
1154 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
48.08 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GA106
N14E-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
12 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²
Board Design
100W
TDP
70W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
2
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
3
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m
4
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
5
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
6
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
7
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max Q
8
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
9
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs NVIDIA Tesla C870
10
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs NVIDIA L40
Related News
1
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
2
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
3
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
4
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
5
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
6
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
7
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
8
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
9
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
10
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy