Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4100M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

NVIDIA Quadro K4100M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4100M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4100M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4100M +238%
1.627 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Oct 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
1152
Shading Units
192
96
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
67.78 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.627 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
67.78 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GF106
N15E-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
62W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy