Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA GRID K2

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA GRID K2

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 4GB VRAM GRID K2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (108W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K2 's Advantages
192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
GRID K2 +8%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
1536
112
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK104
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
GK104-895-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.175
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy