Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1328 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200 +4688%
2.107 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Dec 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
16
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.00 GFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GT218
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
GT218 GL
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

108W
TDP
28W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy