NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 8GB VRAM GRID M6 8Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Boost Clock784MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 108W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
GRID M6 8Q
+5%
2.218 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
1536
112
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.21 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
69.31 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.218 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
69.31 GFLOPS
Board Design
108W
TDP
100W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GM204
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
GM204-995-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
