Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA GRID M60 4A

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA GRID M60 4A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 4GB VRAM GRID M60 4A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
Lower TDP (108W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID M60 4A 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 50% (1178MHz vs 784MHz)
704 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
GRID M60 4A +128%
4.825 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
557 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
2048
112
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GM204
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy