Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 95% (1530MHz vs 784MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216 +643%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
1312 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
5120
112
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GV100
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

108W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy