CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K4200
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1104 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 108W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
+387%
2.107 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200
VS
Quadro 3000M
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
5
1344
Shading Units
240
112
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
108W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GF104
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600
2
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
3
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070 Q
4
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
5
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
6
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
7
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2070
8
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile
9
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB
10
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
Related News
1
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
2
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
3
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
4
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
5
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
6
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
7
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
8
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
9
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
10
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy