Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1104 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200 +387%
2.107 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
5
1344
Shading Units
240
112
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GF104
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy