Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 500M

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 500M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1248 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200 +683%
2.107 TFLOPS
Quadro 500M
0.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
1344
Shading Units
96
112
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
35W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GF108
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
N12M-Q3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy