Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Lower TDP (108W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (902MHz vs 784MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
Quadro K6000 +146%
5.196 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro K4200
32
Quadro K6000 +156%
82
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
797 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
902 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
2880
112
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.12 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.732 TFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK110B
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
GK110-890-B1
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy