Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 86% (1455MHz vs 784MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
Quadro T1000 Mobile +23%
2.607 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
1395 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
1344
Shading Units
896
112
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.56 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
81.48 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.215 TFLOPS
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.607 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.48 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
TU117
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy