Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (1005MHz vs 784MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
5568 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
GRID A100A +559%
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
108
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
6912
112
TMUs
432
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA100
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

108W
TDP
400W
300 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy