CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K4200
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Boost Clock784MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 108W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000M
+2%
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200
VS
Quadro M3000M
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
1024
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
108W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GM204
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Tesla T4
2
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T
3
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB
4
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
5
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB
6
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Tesla K10
7
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
8
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
9
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
10
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs AMD Instinct MI300A
Related News
1
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
2
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
3
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
4
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
5
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
6
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
7
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
8
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
9
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
10
Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy