Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA A10M

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA A10M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition and 24GB VRAM A10M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
2.169 TFLOPS
A10M +980%
23.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Feb 2022
Quadro
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1635 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
56
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
7168
128
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.8 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
366.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.44 TFLOPS
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.44 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
732.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA102
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Board Design

122W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy