Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 122W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition +1255%
2.169 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Feb 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
1536
Shading Units
64
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

122W
TDP
70W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB8E-GLM3
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy