Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs NVIDIA GRID M60 8Q

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs NVIDIA GRID M60 8Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 8GB VRAM GRID M60 8Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
Lower TDP (122W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID M60 8Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1178MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2.169 TFLOPS
GRID M60 8Q +122%
4.825 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2013
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
2048
128
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

122W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GM204
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy