NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA GRID K220Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M and 512MB VRAM GRID K220Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K220Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5100M
+3%
2.369 TFLOPS
GRID K220Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
1536
128
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
24.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
98.69 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.369 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
98.69 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GK104
N15E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
