NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 166% (2050MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5100M
2.369 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+608%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
1950 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
4096
128
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
24.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
98.69 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
2.369 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
98.69 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
DG2-512
N15E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
