Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs Intel Arctic Sound M

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs Intel Arctic Sound M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Boost Clock771MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5100M
2.369 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M +522%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
8192
128
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
98.69 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
2.369 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
98.69 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
DG2-512
N15E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy