Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M and 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (902MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5100M
2.369 TFLOPS
Quadro K6000 +119%
5.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
797 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
902 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
2880
128
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.12 GPixel/s
98.69 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.369 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
98.69 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.732 TFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK110B
N15E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
GK110-890-B1
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy