NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA A10M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 24GB VRAM A10M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 112% (1635MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
4864 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
A10M
+559%
23.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2022
Quadro
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
975 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1635 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
2304
Shading Units
7168
192
TMUs
224
48
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.8 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
366.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.44 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.44 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
732.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
