NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 2GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 81% (1395MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 2
+181%
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2020
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
2304
Shading Units
3584
192
TMUs
224
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
