Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 24GB VRAM Quadro M6000 24 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (1114MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro M6000 24 GB +92%
6.844 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K5200
293
Quadro M6000 24 GB +58%
464
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
988 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
3072
192
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
285.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GM200
-
GPU Variant
GM200-880-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
8 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy