Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 16GB VRAM Jetson Orin NX 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Boost Clock771MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200 +88%
3.553 TFLOPS
Jetson Orin NX 16 GB
1.88 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2023
Quadro
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
2304
Shading Units
1024
192
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
32
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.69 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.38 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.760 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.880 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
940.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GA10B
-
GPU Variant
TE980M-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
Unknown
561 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net