NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+631%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Nov 2010
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
2304
Shading Units
256
192
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
142W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-825-A3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
