Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI50

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI50

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Instinct MI50 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 319% (3230MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (322.3GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI50 +644%
26.46 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2025
Quadro
Generation
Navi IV
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x8

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
2220 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
3230 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2518 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
322.3GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
2048
192
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
206.7 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
413.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.92 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.46 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
826.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
Navi 44
-
GPU Variant
Navi 44 XT
Kepler
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
Unknown
561 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net