NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 105% (1582MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro P5000 Mobile
+82%
6.48 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K5200
293
Quadro P5000 Mobile
+86%
546
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
1278 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1582 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
2304
Shading Units
2048
192
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.2 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
202.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
101.2 GFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.480 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
202.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GP104
-
GPU Variant
N17E-Q5-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
