Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200 +631%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jun 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
2304
Shading Units
256
192
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
142W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy