Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Quadro GP100 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 87% (1442MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro GP100 +191%
10.34 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
1304 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1442 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
2304
Shading Units
3584
192
TMUs
224
48
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.4 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
323.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.67 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.34 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.168 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
235W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GP100
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
6.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy