NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 111% (1627MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Embedded
+87%
6.664 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K5200
293
RTX A1000 Embedded
+342%
1297
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
1192 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
2304
Shading Units
2048
192
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
60W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
Unknown
561 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
