Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro M620 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (977MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200 +255%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro M620 Mobile
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
756 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
977 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
512
192
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.63 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.26 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.26 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy