Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 79% (1380MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q +98%
7.066 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K5200
293
Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q +622%
2117
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
780 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
40
2304
Shading Units
2560
192
TMUs
160
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
220.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.13 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.066 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
220.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
80W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
TU104
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy