NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Tesla M6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 8GB VRAM Tesla M6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla M6 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 53% (1180MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Tesla M6
+2%
3.625 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K5200
2072
Tesla M6
+45%
3008
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1180 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
1536
192
TMUs
96
48
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.52 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
113.3 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.625 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
113.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
GM204-995-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
