Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 89% (1455MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200 +36%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro T1000 Mobile
2.607 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
1395 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
2304
Shading Units
896
192
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.56 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
81.48 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.215 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.607 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.48 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy